Work is intended to give man self-assurance and dignity. Then why does one rob him of these two important fruits, by making work into drudgery, a load for those low on the economic ladder?
Labor, dignity, and shared prosperity
labor and management; labor relations; profit sharing
Editorial introduction
Work is meant to give a person self-assurance and dignity, ‘Abdu’l-Bahá says, and then He asks why so many are robbed of both by drudgery. Having seen the coal miners and the ship labourers, He answers concretely: a fair daily wage, a share in the profits of the enterprise, workers who elect their own representatives to consult with the company, and hours short enough to leave leisure to think and grow. He treats fairness as reciprocal, owners bound to kindness and workers to good faith, and insists that a quarrel between them is never merely private, since a nation’s livelihood is one fabric and a tear anywhere is felt everywhere. Deuteronomy’s rule that a poor labourer be paid before the sun sets shows how old and how plain this concern is [1]. The village storehouse, with its graduated tithes and its care for orphans and the infirm, is an example rather than a statute, and the journey it begins leads into justice itself, into the moderation of wealth and poverty, and into a measured reckoning with capitalism and its rivals.
Selected passages
What hardship these coal miners have to suffer, how poor and needy they are! It is necessary for the directors of companies and the owners of factories to allot a certain share, however small it may be, to their laborers so that their condition may be improved and they may be deterred from striking.
How poor are they [labourers on ship], and how hard they toil! The presidents of factories and other operations must allocate a share [of the profits] for the workers in their companies, so that these poor souls may know some comfort. Perchance they may serve with all their heart and soul as a result and not go on strike.
That all mankind might have opportunity, it was necessary to shorten the hours of labor so that the work of the world could be completed without such demand of strain and effort, and all human beings would have leisure to think and develop individual capacity.
My objects are the establishment of the Cause of international arbitration, the promotion of the oneness of the world of humanity, the conformity of religion with science and reason, the elucidation of the essential unity of the divine religions, the explanation of the continuity of the prophetic revelation, the instruction of mankind in the knowledge of human brotherhood, the inculcation of the primordial oneness of all phenomena, the upraising of the standard of the solidarity of the human race, the creation of a nucleus for bringing about the universal race, the spread of the precepts of spiritual civilization, the teachings of the synthesis of the heavenly philosophy, the readjustment of the economic relations between the capitalists and laborers, so that each individual member of the world of humanity may enjoy the utmost welfare and prosperity, the organization of the Arbitral Court of justice - in order that all the nations of the world may settle before that Court their international disputes and thus remove all the traces of enmity and hatred and the upholding of the principle of one auxiliary, universal language.
Regarding the partnership of workers with capitalists that you wrote about: Workers must certainly receive daily wages, but in addition they should have a share with the capitalists so they will work with the utmost effort. For example, a capitalist who has a thousand workers must give them moderate daily wages so they do not remain hungry and unclothed, and also allocate a portion of the profit income specifically for the workers to be distributed among them at year's end, causing the workers to show the utmost zeal and give the utmost importance to perfecting their craft and work.
The Capitalists must be kind toward the Workers and treat them with justice and fairness; and they should appreciate the value of their labour; for labourers are serving the Capitalists. In the same way labourers ought to be pleased and grateful to the Capitalists; for their means of subsistance and comfort depend upon the help of Capitalists. If there were no Capitalists the labourers would be extremely distressed.
He was interested in the economic problem and asked the following question: "When the time comes for the working people to become the partners of their employers, will they have their own representatives to consult with the company and will those who invest more capital receive more shares?" Abdul-Baha replied: "Certainly, when the working people become partners with the company, they will select their own representatives for consultation and those who have more capital will earn more money."
Of course the workers, when they partner in the factory with the company, will elect from among themselves individuals for consultation, and it is certain that whoever has more capital will have a greater share.
Although expenses in England are less compared to America, still the wages of workers are low. This is why they go on strike and workers always unite and stop working. The Socialists cause revolution. Inevitably, complete rules and regulations must be established regarding workers' and laborers' affairs.
… If companies give workers a share, both strikes will be eliminated and it will cause general progress.
What hath been stated is only an example and this doth not mean that it should be enforced exactly in this manner. The principle is that as a man's wealth increaseth, his financial obligations should proportionately increase, so that vast riches may not be accumulated in one place. In this manner justice may be exercised between the rich and the poor. Thus there will not be, on one hand, a man owning a thousand million and, on the other, a poor man in need of his necessary subsistence.
… These are only the preliminary principles; the House of Justice will arrange and widen them in accordance with time and place.
"The solution begins with the village, and when the village is reconstructed, then the cities will be also. The idea is this, that in each village will be erected a store-house. In the language of Religion it is called the House of Finance. That is a universal store-house, which is commenced in the village. Its administration is through a committee of the wise ones of the community, and with the approval of that committee all the affairs are directed.
… "If there is something left over (after these expenditures) it should be given to the Great House of Justice. And thus there will be no want in the village. The people will not remain hungry, they will not remain naked. All will be in the utmost welfare and comfort.
Those villages around the big cities are represented by the House of Justice of that city. The village is the unit. Its wise men are chosen to administer the affairs of the village. For example, there may be a farmer who has no animals, implements or seeds, and this committee will help him. There will be universal banks and the council will borrow money from them and loan it to the people. For instance they will borrow at three per cent and loan to the people at four per cent. The one per cent is for the expenses; and thus the village will have the storehouse.
In future a manufacturer will not be allowed to leave all his property to his own family. A law will be made something like this--that he must leave one-quarter only of his property to his family, and the other three-quarters must go to the factory workers who have created his wealth.
The Managers of these Steamship companies must in a degree look after each ones comfort and well-being of these poor men. They are not treated with kindness, and work very hard. The scale of their wages is very low. Often they have brought other nationalities to work in this line, but they could not stand its insurmountable difficulties except the Arabs. At least the Companies must build for them a public bath, so that when they leave their work they may wash their bodies. All day they breathe the dust of the coal, and thus their lungs are affected.
Further quotations · supplied wording and references
In every village there must be established a general storehouse which will have a number of revenues. The first revenue will be that of the tenth or tithes. The second revenue [will be derived] from the animals. The third revenue, from the minerals; that is to say, every mine prospected or discovered, a third thereof will go to this vast storehouse. The fourth is this: whosoever dies without leaving any heirs, all his heritage will go to the general storehouse. Fifth, if any treasures shall be found on the land, they should be devoted to this storehouse. All these revenues will be assembled in this storehouse. … In the village no one will remain in need or in want. All will live in the utmost comfort and welfare. Yet no schism will assail the general order of the body politic.
No, Baha'u'llah did not bring a complete system of economics to the world. Profit-sharing is recommended as a solution to one form of economic problems. There is nothing in the teachings against some kind of capitalism; its present form, though, would require adjustments to be made. There are practically no technical teachings on economics in the Cause, such as banking, the price system, and others. The Cause is not an economic system, nor its Founders be considered as having been technical economists. The contribution of the Faith to this subject is essentially indirect, as it consists of the application of spiritual principles to our present-day economic system. Baha'u'llah has given us a few basic principles which should guide future Baha'i economists in establishing such institutions which will adjust the economic relationships of the world...
Continue exploring
- critique of Western values; culture
- critiques of capitalism, communism, socialism
Consider the relationship between limits on concentrated wealth and protection of the poor.
- justice ['adl]; social justice and divine justice
- maintainance of degrees in society
- wealth inequality and its moderation
For thought and discussion
Questions to carry forward
- What would it mean for work to develop a person’s capacities rather than consume all the time and energy needed for them?
- How might participation in benefits and decisions change the relationship between workers and owners?
- When does an apparently private economic dispute become a matter of public concern?
- How can the detailed examples be studied seriously while respecting the passages that leave arrangements open to future judgment?
- What different contributions can fair institutions, voluntary generosity, and personal conduct make to shared prosperity?