The birth of Christ: mystery, recognition, and divine perfections
birth of Christ; purity; virginity of Mary
Editorial introduction
If being born without a father were a virtue, ‘Abdu’l-Bahá remarks, Adam would outrank every Prophet, since He had neither father nor mother. The greatness of Christ lies elsewhere, in the divine perfections that shone through Him, and that is where any thinking about His birth has to begin. Bahá’u’lláh then turns to Mary, so perplexed and so grieved that she wished she had never been born, unable to tell her neighbours that a Child whose father no one knew had been conceived of the Holy Spirit; and upon that fatherless Babe God conferred the glory of Prophethood. The virgin birth is affirmed, and so are its mysteries: that Christ came from heaven though He came from Mary’s womb, that the first man had no parents at all, and that what has never been observed is not the same as what is impossible. Shoghi Effendi adds that a God called the Unconstrained may alter the laws He wrote, and that mystery is an inseparable part of true religion. Luke’s account of Gabriel, Mary’s question and her willing answer belongs beside the Íqán’s portrait of her ordeal [1]. The road continues toward miracles and their meaning, the doctrines of Christianity, and the interpretation of the scriptures that carry this story.
Selected passages
We breathed Our spirit upon Mary and accepted from the wife of Imran her vow unto God, the Most High.
This gift was shining on the face of the Virgin Mary like unto a brilliant gem glistening on the great crown of glory.
Therefore, O ye who seek His countenance, who stand at His threshold, and whose hearts are quickened by His fragrance - turn ye wholly toward Him, and receive bounty from His nature, that ye may behold the fire of Moses, witness the flame of Sinai, inhale the breath of the Messiah, see the garden of Abraham, observe the blood sacrifice of John son of Zacharias, find the fountain of life of Khidr, contemplate the sacrifice of the Offering, perceive the beauty of Joseph, hear the sighing and lamentation of Jacob, know the affliction and sorrow of Job, establish the lesson of Enoch, understand the intensity of Eve's separation, and recognize the chastity and purity of Mary.
And certainly Christ had come from heaven because He was the King of Heaven, though outwardly He came from Mary's womb.
In the Gospel it is explicitly stated that in His first coming, although Christ was born to Mary, He Himself said that He came from heaven. Thus, the meaning of 'heaven' is the greatness of the Cause and eminence and might of the Manifestation of God Who spreads this divine Cause by His heavenly power and divine strength and not through material means.
Some questioned Mary: "Where did Jesus come from?" She answered: "Cut of my womb." He (Christ) said--" I have come from Heaven"--and they would say: "This man we know is from Nazareth. How came He then from Heaven?" Therefore they denied Him.
In brief, the philosophers and men of science of Europe entertain no doubt whatever regarding the origination of the three kingdoms; nay, they insist upon it with remarkable firmness. In that case, according to their own belief, the first man came into being and was born without father or mother. Despite this admission and acknowledgement, how can they regard with wonder and astonishment the birth of Christ through the bounty of the Holy Spirit? For He, at least, had a mother, whereas the first-born man was without father and without mother.
O maid-servant of God, the example of His Holiness Christ is similar to His Holiness Adam. Did the first man who was created in the world have a father and mother? Certainly, he had no father nor mother, and thus Jesus was without father.
Some of the pupils in the Schools of Science once came to Akka and asked the question regarding the Immaculate Conception of our Lord. He answered, "A living body cannot come from a dead body - only a living man can make a living child - this is a scientific fact." The Scientists answered "It is impossible for a child to be born without a father" and that nothing could change their opinion concerning it. They left that subject and began to speak of others and finally of geology and of well-known scientific facts. They spoke of the way in which the Earth had been thrown off from the Sun - of how it had gradually cooled and a crust had formed to make a surface of the Earth, and went on to speak of the Creation of nature and finally of man's Creation.
Our Lord said, "You believe in the Creation of man?" (Adam) They said "Yes." Our Lord said to them "And who were the father and mother of Adam? You said that you couldn't believe that Jesus Christ could be born without an earthly father (when he had a Mother) yet you can believe that Adam was born without either."
Once some materialists came to Acca to ask Abbas Effendi what about the Immaculate Conception. He answered: "A living body cannot come forth from a dead body. Only a living man can make a living child; this is a scientific fact."
The scholars said it is impossible for a child to be born without a father, and said nothing could change their opinion regarding it. They left the subject and began speaking of geology - scientific facts well known. They were led to speak of their idea of evolution of man from the atom and molecule all through the different stations until at last man was evolved from all these previous conditions. Then Abbas Effendi said: "Well, did the first man who was evolved have a father and mother, as you said a child must have that comes into this world?" They said: "Why no, of course not." Then the Master said: "Well, if God could make the first man who came upon the earth without a father or mother, could he not make Jesus Christ also without a human father?" They were confounded and said nothing more, but after that they were converted and went away believers.
Asked if Jesus was immaculately conceived, He answered:
"It is not impossible that He should have been, though it is not necessary that all Manifestations should come in that way."
Isaiah prophesied that a virgin would conceive and bring forth a son, and His name would be called Immanuel--God with us. While the Christians claim this passage is to be taken literally, and that it means that Christ was born of a virgin, it is a prophecy of Christ, but in the original, the word translated "virgin" means a pure, chaste woman, and that was Mary, Joseph's wife. All the Old Testament prophecies foretold the coming of Christ. The Gospel of Christ shadowed forth the coming of the Manifestation.
Regarding His Holiness Christ and His birth into this world of matter; Speak not of this, if you can. Should anyone ask, answer: ‘His Holiness Christ was born of the Holy Spirit,' and let that be final.
The Christians exaggerated the birth of Jesus.
Christ said that His mother Mary was not of His Relationship, also that those were His brothers and sisters who were in the Kingdom of God.
There is a special time to plant the seed; there is a special time for its growth; a special time to gather the harvest; a special time for the threshing. When the seed is first planted, you cannot expect to gather the harvest immediately. A baby is first nourished by milk, gradually he is fed on other foods. Mary desired that Christ would reveal Himself to those present, but He said: "The hour is not yet come."
However, some among the ancients through the power of detachment gained knowledge of certain cosmic mysteries and obtained awareness of relationships and connections that exist between created things - they became aware of certain hidden secrets in the realities of things and deduced some future events from the relationships between existing things. This cannot be denied, as mentioned in the Kitab-i-Iqan regarding the brilliant star that indicated the birth of Christ.
It is really very sad to see how Buddha and Christ are fallen into the hands of the bad people of their respective followers. Without the exact knowledge of their physiognomies every day they represent them under different forms. One day suffering him to sit under the Lotus tree and another day placing Jesus over the cross!
When the Emperor inquired concerning Mary's condition and purpose, she answered: "I have come on behalf of the Christians, and the Christians entreat intercession for the slayers of Christ and the bestowal of peace and security upon the Jews; for Pilate and Herod are molesting the Jews.
O thou who speakest the praise of the Lord! In these days when the morn of certitude hath dawned from the dayspring of divine knowledge and the light of the Lord of Hosts shineth forth from the horizon of bounty, when the clouds of generosity pour down their rain and the mercy of the seen and unseen world is manifest, when the ocean of favors is surging and the lamp of bestowals is brightly burning, when the Fire of Moses blazeth forth in the Tree of Sinai and the breath of Jesus from the invisible Kingdom wafteth like the fragrance of ambergris and musk - open thine eyes and behold the divine rose-garden, and unstop thine ears and hearken to the call of the Most Glorious Beauty and the summons of the Most Exalted One from the heaven of the unseen realm.
Further quotations · supplied wording and references
When Her Holiness the Essence of Sanctification and Reality of Holiness, Mary the Virgin - upon her be greetings and praise - became sanctified and purified from worldly concerns, she bore such a luminous fruit that she became the shell for that divine pearl and the target for endless arrows of cruelty.
First regarding the birth of Jesus Christ. In the light of what Baha'u'llah and 'Abdu'l-Baha have stated concerning this subject it is evident that Jesus came into this world through the direct intervention of the Holy Spirit, and that consequently His birth was quite miraculous. This is an established fact, and the friends need not feel at all surprised, as the belief in the possibility of miracles has never been rejected in the Teachings. Their importance, however, has been minimized.
With regard to your question concerning the Virgin Birth of Jesus; on this point, as on several others, the Baha'i Teachings are in full agreement with the doctrines of the Catholic Church. In the 'Kitab-i-Iqan' (Book of Certitude) p. 56, and in a few other Tablets still unpublished, Baha'u'llah confirms, however, indirectly, the Catholic conception of the Virgin Birth. Also 'Abdu'l-Baha in the 'Some Answered Questions', Chap. XII, p.73, explicitly states that 'Christ found existence through the Spirit of God' which statement necessarily implies, when viewed in the light of the text, that Jesus was not the son of Joseph.
What science calls a virgin birth we do not associate with that of Jesus Christ, which we believe to have been a miracle and a sign of His Prophethood. In this matter we are in entire agreement with the most orthodox church views.
The belief in the possibilities of miracles, on the contrary, implies that God's power is beyond any limitation whatsoever. For it is only logical to believe that the Creator, Who is the sole Author of all the laws operating in the universe, is above them and can, therefore, if He deems it necessary, alter them at His Own Will. We, as humans, cannot possibly attempt to read His Mind, and to fully grasp His Wisdom. Mystery is therefore an inseparable part of true religion, and as such, should be recognized by the believers.
One thing, however, he wishes again to bring to your attention, namely that miracles are always possible, even though they do not constitute a regular channel whereby God reveals His power to mankind. To reject miracles on the ground that they imply a breach in the laws of nature is a very shallow, well nigh stupid argument, inasmuch as God Who is the Author of the universe can, in His Wisdom and Omnipotence, bring any change, no matter how temporary, in the operation of the laws which He Himself created.
Certainly not, for we as Baha'is ought to believe, if not in all the miracles reported in the Bible, at least in their possibility. For there's nothing irrational in miracles. God, Who is the author of this universe can well, if He deems it wise, alter the operation of its laws. Otherwise, He would cease to be supreme. Has He not been called by Baha'u'llah the Unconstrained? And who knows His purpose in causing the virgin birth of Jesus? Who is man to question the ways and methods of God?
The Master clearly writes in a Tablet that Christ was not begotten in the ordinary way, but by the Holy Spirit. So we must accept this. Every Faith has some miracles, and this is the great miracle of the Christian Faith. But we must not let it be a test to us. Our human minds are so small, and as yet so immature compared to the men of the future, that we should have no difficulty in acknowledging the Power of God when He chooses to show it in some manner 'illogical' to us!
We believe that Christ only was conceived immaculately. His brothers and sisters would have been born in the natural way and conceived naturally.
The churches teach doctrines--various ones in various creeds--which we as Baha'is do not accept; such as the bodily Resurrection, confession, or in some creeds, the denial of the Immaculate Conception.
In a Tablet that has not yet been translated from the original Persian, the Master says the conception of Christ was extraordinary, against the natural law. He defines the natural law and says it was not according to this law. The Baha'is must accept the immaculate conception. Every religion has its mysteries. The Virgin Mary's perplexity was not due to shame, but because she could not explain her condition.
Regarding immaculate conception: the Master and Baha'u'llah both confirmed this. It is true but do not stress it.
As to the position of Christianity, let it be stated without any hesitation or equivocation that its Divine origin is unconditionally acknowledged, that the Sonship and Divinity of Jesus Christ are fearlessly asserted, that the Divine inspiration of the Gospel is fully recognized, that the reality of the mystery of the Immaculacy of the Virgin Mary is confessed...
Continue exploring
For thought and discussion
Questions to carry forward
- How does beginning with Christ’s divine perfections affect the way you approach the accounts of His birth?
- What do Mary’s anguish in the Íqán and her question and response in Luke reveal about the human experience of religious mystery?
- How do the passages distinguish heavenly origin from the circumstances of earthly birth?
- What is the difference between arguing that an event is possible and explaining how it occurred?
- How should differences among scriptural exposition, historical scientific analogies, reported conversations, and later letters guide a careful reading?
- What might a conversation about this subject gain by returning to Christ’s qualities and mission, and to the connected subjects of miracles and interpretation?